老司机传媒

Evaluation Criteria for Manuscripts

Criteria

 

1

2

3

4

5

 

Importance of Topic/Study for the Practice of Christian Leadership (new perspective/ approach,  improvement of practice)

Not important

Very Important

Relevance of Topic/Study to the Dialogue on Transformational Servant Leadership (original, important, significant)

Not relevant

Relevant

Literature and/or Empirical Basis (adequate, relevant, situated in the field)

Not grounded

Highly grounded

Appropriateness/Rigor of Research Method (conceptually, theoretically, methodologically, and analytically sound)

Poor design

Strong design

Quality of Interpretations/ Conclusions (conclusions supported by evidence)

Poor quality

High quality

Contribution to the Literature (theoretically and/or practically significant)

Not significant

Highly significant

Overall Quality of Manuscript (writing, clarity, logic, organization)

Poor

Excellent

Figures, Tables, and Other Supporting Material (accurate, clear, necessary)

Poor quality

High quality

 

Related information
  • First-time authors of articles not intended to report research, read the following suggestions first.
  • To see the Guidelines for Authors, click here.
  • Evaluation criteria for manuscripts